"The Meg Deb"

As I have posted before, Scott Coffey is dangerous to the proper functioning of a school district. As a member of the District 26 school board, he advocated for the closing of schools and the axing of programs. Balancing budgets on the backs of kids is NOT what fiscal responsibility is.

And now he wants to do that to District 155. He even stated on McHenry County Blog that "it is completely clear that one of the buildings needs to be closed." Make no mistake: Scott Coffey and his ilk are bent on destroying public education in the name of balancing budgets and "fiscal responsibility." 

And Meghan Tillson has aligned with Scott Coffey in that aim. Although she recently commented on a Facebook post that she would not vote to close a school, her alliance to and support of Scott Coffey tends to point otherwise. Before becoming a school board candidate, Meghan Tillson posted under the name "Meg Deb," and regurgitated Scott Coffey talking points.  That profile has since been deleted. All references to "Meg Deb" have been scrubbed. 

Having these two on the school board will be detrimental to District 155. 

Scott Coffey and the D155 School Board Election

It's election season again, and people who should not be anywhere near a school board are running to get a seat on the District 155 school board.

Here's what I can tell you. I am not a fan of Scott Coffey. I was involved in the debacle at District 26 years ago. During that time, the Cary schools were attacked and the education of our kids suffered.

• Art classes were eliminated
• Music classes were eliminated
• PE teachers were let go, forcing classroom teachers to teach "gym"
• Class sizes were s high as 35 kids
• Parents were angry. I talked to so many parents that were thinking about leaving Cary altogether. Many took their kids out of d26, actually.

It was a debacle. And Scott Coffey had a hand in it.

My oldest was in the Cary schools at that time. And, as many parents, I was so concerned about the lack of specials. As a result, parents volunteered their time to come in and teach lessons on art to Cary students.

I did that. I took personal time to teach my son art in his elementary school classroom.

All because some people are confused about fiscal responsibility. In any school board, the responsibility FIRST should be the kids. And this was not what happened.

Specials are back in d26. But the stain of this remains. Justified or not, people do not look to the Cary schools like they did before. Teacher retention is low. It takes a long time to recover from such mismanagement.

And now Scott Coffey is comparing the situation in d155 to d26, echoing the same rhetoric from a decade ago.  And it is simply not true.

And the effects of a Coffey-led agenda would be devastating on d155.

To be honest, I do not know anything about Meghan Tillson and Jacob Justen. However, since they have aligned themselves with Coffey tells me that they, too, should be avoided at all costs.

I know, I know. Some people are going to look at this and say, "Well, he's a teacher and he's biased." I am a teacher.

And I am biased in favor of public education. As a taxpayer I believe that our schools are our biggest asset. And any attempt to balance budgets on the backs of kids is the wrong way to go about managing school budgets in a responsible way.

Scott Coffey is not what d155 needs.

Andrew Gasser. What can I say?

I've been avoiding local politics. National politics are bad enough. But what happens when a local, insignificant, sycophantic, infantile official increasingly debases public institutions and removes services that go to the "common good?" And then uses those same taxpayer-funded institutions to attack the press? You fight it.

Yes, Andrew Gasser, I am talking about you.

Andrew Gasser is a clown

Andrew Gasser...Draining the Swamp?

During the recent local elections, Andrew Gasser commandeered Donald Trump's campaign slogan of "draining the swamp."

Instead of draining the swamp, he created a swamp of broken televisions and gallons of paint.

You see, Algonquin Township has a nationally recognized recycling program that accepts paint, electronics and other items on the last Saturday of the month starting in March.

Or, I should say, had a nationally recognized recycling program.

But that was B.A.G. -- Before Andrew Gasser.

Today, many people went to the Algonquin Township office with their televisions and paint, but found it closed.

Yes, the sign along the street did say that "specialized" recycling for May was cancelled:

But the signs in the parking lot announce that recycling is on Saturday.  So people dropped off a bunch of stuff.

And now, Andrew Gasser has released a video of the mess and blamed the residents for not following directions.

Other than driving by the office, how would people have known that the recycling has been cancelled? It certainly wasn't on the website.  In fact, the website is nothing compared to what it had been before Gasser's election.

If you wanted to go to the recycling center's website, this is what you would find:

Here is what is was in April:

In fact, all of the information that used to be accessible on the Algonquin Township Highway Department is no longer available online. No information about the recycling center. No calendar. No news. Nothing.

In fact, this is what the homepage looks like today:

And here is what it looked like in April:

So what is Gasser up to?  On the surface, he's simply blaming others for his incompetence. But it is more than that. After the election, he removes all references to the recycling program from the website, offers no links, no news to the cancellation of the end-of-the-month Specialty recycling. He puts up only one sign, but keeps the others up in the parking lot.

And when people show up, he gets angry, films the mess and blames those who left the paint and tv's. He even threatens people with the surveillance cameras. 

Nice job draining that swamp Andrew.

I can't wait to see what you so next.

The Scott Vetter Ruse

Yep. Scott Vetter claimed to the Northwest Herald that he has removed himself from the slate, in order to protect the others, apparently, from his toxicity.

But what does that actually mean?

He's still on the ballot.

He's still apparently campaigning.

Case in point: he posted to the article on the McHenry County blog the following:

This doesn't seem to be someone who has "removed himself" from the slate.

The only thing that happened here is that he told the Northwest Herald he removed himself from the slate.

But nothing has changed.

Oh, look: squirrel!

----- More later.

Scott Vetter is dropping from the slate...but is still in the race

Apparently, Scott Vetter is worried that his tweeting may bring down his running mates, Donna Kurtz, Raphael Kamner and John Pletz in the race for the District 155 Board of Education.

So, according to another Northwest Herald article, he is leaving the slate. However, he is not leaving the race.  "I would still love to win," he stated.

His running mates have not really commented on the matter, except in this recent article. No one, except Kamner, has actually come to Vetter's defense. That's pretty telling, isn't it?

Kamner stated in the article, "He is not a racist now nor has he ever been, and he’s not anti-religious."

Funny, but do the videos claim that he is a racist? No, not really. The tweets are just shown as an example of inflammatory rhetoric not befitting of a school board member.

It's interesting that Vetter supporters are honing in on two of the tweets.  In fact, the McHenry County Blog recently posted an article about Scott Vetter with a screenshot from the video of the the "BLM racists" tweet Vetter sent on July 31, 2016.  The article is entitled "So Scott Vetter's a racist?" And, in an attempt to prove something about Scott Vetter that was never even claimed in any of the videos, author Cal Skinner posted a picture of Vetter and his wife.

This is a classic example of a "Strawman Fallacy." Skinner and supporters of Vetter are focusing on the two race and religious tweets and declaring that Vetter is not a racist. This misses the entire point of the video. The video used the tweets to show the inflammatory rhetoric of a candidate for the school board. If people are thinking that others may think that Scott Vetter is a racist are reading more into the video than is there. This actually says more about them than about Scott Vetter.

So I attempted to set the matter straight by commenting on the article in the McHenry County Blog. But, alas, my comment is still "awaiting moderation:"

The point is this: if someone wants to post inflammatory tweets, call people names on social media, that's fine. They have the right to do that. We all do.

But don't be surprised when you run for a position on a board of education that those tweets will resurface as an example of your demeanor. Remember, this is behavior we teach our kids not to engage it. Go ahead: call people "fucking idiots" on Twitter. Or, post an article about the President on Facebook and call him an "Ass Clown." That's fine.

But don't cry when these things are brought to the attention of voters. Right, Raph Kamner?

"Tweetgate" and Vetter's Running mates

So, "Tweetgate" is a thing--as it should be. After all, the the public postings of someone who could be in charge of the direction of our children's education is fair game.  These tweets reveal the character and demeanor of a person who could possibly sit on a board of education and help form educational policy.

What's even more telling is that Scott Vetter is running on a slate with three other candidates: Donna Kurtz, Raphael Kamner and Jeff Pletz. These candidates have been silent on the issue of the tweets. Jennifer Weinhammer is running for Cary Trustee, and she has been on record publicly endorsing Scott Vetter in other races. She, too, is silent.

What does this silence say?  We can only imagine.

Scott Vetter and "Tweetgate"

What does it take for Drew “Mad Again” Madigan to come out of retirement?

Scott Vetter and the Northwest Herald.

I have blogged about the Northwest Herald’s stellar reporting before, and man, they keep getting better with age.

For those of you who have not been following the news, or have been out of the country, or live in a cave, Scott Vetter is Crystal Lake resident running for a spot on the District 155 School Board.  He has been involved a bit in McHenry County Republican politics for a few years.

One thing is for sure: He likes to tweet.  And last year, he tweeted a lot. Here is an example of a gem of a tweet that has been enshrined for posterity in the Google cache system:

A“campaign” video has been created to highlight those tweets.


Of course, Scott Vetter claims that he had been hacked. That’s the go-to for politicians today to try and cover up obnoxious behavior online.

“I didn’t call that guy a ‘fucking idiot.’ I was hacked!” See how easy that is? 

The problem is that Scott Vetter’s explanation just doesn’t make sense. 

Let’s take a look:

1) In a Facebook post, he claims that he hadn’t used that twitter account in “two years.” However, the account was for his position as Algonquin Precinct 36 committeeman. He didn’t get that position until April of 2016, when he wrote an email to McHenry County blog, identifying himself as the "newly elected Precinct 36 Committeemen in Algonquin Township."

2) In another post, he claims that the account was shut down over a year ago, but the account didn’t exist before June 2016, as is shown in the cached screen images. There is no record at all of an account existing before this date. And why would it? Vetter wasn’t the committee chairman long before that time.

3) Then, in the same post, he says that he closed the account in September, which is way less than a year ago. And the tweets in question come before that date. Confused? Yeah, it’s like an episode of Lost. It just doesn’t make sense.

3) Later, he admitted in the Facebook post that some of his tweets were his but were used, apparently, by the hackers and were “taken out of context.” 

But wait, you're saying in your head right now: Didn't he say that he hadn't used the account in two years?  

Yes, he did. But, apparently, we shouldn't take his word. Just the kind of guy you want on a school board, right?

So this became an issue in the race when those tweets surfaced online. And videos like this were made:



So Scott Vetter was caught with his tweets down. Literally.

And in comes the Northwest Herald. They must have put their best journalist on the case because they went right to the source.

Reporter: “Hey, Scott Vetter? How about those tweets?”

Scott Vetter: “I was hacked. Those weren’t mine.”

Reporter: “Cool. Can I quote you?”

Scott Vetter: “Sure.”

So the Northwest Herald reporter—we’ll call him Nate Linhart, because that’s his name—wrote a story that simply allowed Scott Vetter to repeat the same claims he has made over the last few days on Facebook.

I guess fact-checking is not something done by the Northwest Herald.

Or maybe they don’t have access to Google, I am not sure.

A quick glance of the cached images would show that the Twitter account in question was created in June of 2016.

A quick Google search would show that Scott Vetter was elected precinct chairman in April 2016, not 2015 as he claimed in the article.

This was the best part of the article, though:

Vetter said some of those tweets that were on the screenshots were from him, but not ones that used profanity or discriminatory remarks.

That’s Vetter saying, “Yeah, some of those tweets were mine. But only the good ones. The ones that people don’t like, those aren’t mine. Unless you like those, then maybe.”

If a journalist was really doing his job, he would notice that many of those tweets with the profanity that Scott Vetter claims to not have used are in the same Twitter conversations as the ones he takes credit for.

It doesn’t take a genius to figure it out: they were tweeted by the same person! And that person, admittedly, was Scott Vetter. At least for the ones that people aren’t upset about.

Again, some of these inconsistencies could have been checked out by simply typing a few words into Google.

I know, the Northwest Herald has a lot on their plate; more important things like “Spring Grove church hosting special service with Congressman Joe Walsh.”

That should tell you all you need to know. And newsflash: Joe Walsh is no longer a Congressman.

I bet Scott Vetter will be there because Scott Vetter really likes Joe Walsh. In fact, a lot of Scott Vetter’s tweeting was in response to something Joe Walsh tweeted or in defense of Joe Walsh. But most of the time, Scott Vetter simply retweeted Joe Walsh tweets.  

And this is the guy that Donna Kurtz, Raphael Kamner and John Pletz have decided to run with?

And what have they publicly stated about their running mate and “Tweetgate?” 

I'll give you a hint: It sounds something like crickets:

---more later.

Is it time to bring back Drew?

With everything that is going on in the community, it seems like Drew just might be coming back.

Stay tuned.  In the meantime, watch this video:

The Cost of Breaking a Union

Apparently, it is costing taxpayers in Cary a lot of money to break the District 26 teacher’s union.  And for all the talk about fiscal responsibility coming from the board this smacks of hypocrisy.

In addition to paying the Board’s “standard counsel” $1,500 a month, the Board decided to hire another lawyer.  “[He] had come recommended,” Board president Chris Spoerl explained.  In the month of June alone, they paid him $13,789.25.  Then, the following month, Chris Spoerl lamented about the district’s financial situation.    “We have found ourselves in a position where we have to continually fight to stay afloat,” he stated.

I guess “fighting to stay afloat” implies that a high-priced lawyer is needed to bail the water from the ship.   As of July, the board has paid out over $29,000 in legal fees for the ongoing contract negotiations.

Not to mention the hiring of two new administrators at the junior high.

Or $15,000 for some used computers.

Or concluding a new contact with Superintendent Brian Coleman that includes raises based on CPI and up to 4% extra a year upon completion of some undefined “goals.”

Or the unknown amount of money paid to Advantage Analytics, LLC for making the highly informative and enlightening powerpoint presentations Spoerl uses at Board meeting to put us all to sleep.

Nothing like trying to keep a boat afloat which is overburdened with cargo that you yourself have added to the hold. 

Thanks, Chris Spoerl, for showing us that the children really aren’t at the forefront of the Board’s decision-making.  That’s comforting to the thousands of parents who have no choice but to send their kids to District 26 schools.

The Northwest Herald recently reported that $29,000 figure after the documents were secured through Freedom of Information Act requests.  This figure, however, reflects information only through July.  This means that the money given to lawyers is much higher---could even have passed the $40,000 mark, considering that the negotiation team has met several times in the last month and the board apparently thinks nothing of forking over $13k in a month period for legal fees.

The Board wants nothing more than to drag this out as long as possible.  And when this happens, more money flows from Cary taxpayers into the pockets of lawyers.

That is unacceptable. 

Especially considering that this money could have paid for a full time art teacher at one of the schools.

Thanks, board, for showing us your true priority.

------------------------

If you feel that the board is not acting in the best interest of the children or citizens of Cary, please consider signing the petition of no confidence.

Click here to add your name.

Johnny Cash and the Northwest Herald

McHenry County is lucky to have such a high caliber newspaper as The Northwest Herald.

Okay, maybe not.

My wife and I cancelled our subscription to The Northwest Herald a few years ago due to the fact that the paper lacks balance. And there have been some serious flaws in reporting over the years. Amateurish, actually.

When we got a call from them last year to renew our subscription for a 4 day delivery, including Sunday, for a one-time price of $20 or so, we decided to give them another try. After all, if they were offering a subscription like that they must be hurting for readers.

And we just wanted to help them out. We’re like that, you know.

Today, the editor of The Northwest Herald went on his usually tirade. He does that every week. And this time, it was against the teachers of District 26, of course.

Chris Krug likes to do that.

He took issue with the fact that several teachers attended the last board of education meeting wearing black. The headline states, “Back out on the blackout.” Then he goes on to ridicule those teachers for their choice of color, stating, “Teachers wearing black in support of the deal that has been imposed on them is as short sighted as….yada..yada..yada.”

Chris Krug, they were not wearing black in support of the deal. They were wearing black to show that they were not in support of the deal…because, it was not….a deal. A deal implies a mutually agreed upon outcome. The fact is, the board has refused to deal.

He didn’t tell you that, however.

In fact, there was much that Mr. Krug does not mention. Of course, he laments about teachers’ salaries. “No tears will be shed for someone who can’t get by on an average salary of $69,000 a year,” he writes.

But did he tell you that the Superintendent’s base salary of $147,000 is subject to possible increases based on CPI and another 4% a year extra if he meets performance goals?

No, he did not.

Did he mention that this Board of Education has a new budget that includes 2% more allocated to Administration this year?

No, he did not.

Did he mention that the teachers have offered to give up retirement bonuses and end of career bumps?

No, he did not.

Did he mention that teachers have offered to pay 30% more for health insurance?

No, he did not.

Most of the column, actually, was devoted to the lyrics of Johnny Cash’s familiar song, “Man in Black.” In fact, the entire song was reprinted there in the column, taking up perhaps 1/3 of the space.

See, that’s what happens when people have nothing to say. You see this much in high school writing, actually. Kids like to quote songs or a famous person to show that they know how to write and make a point. This happens often in The Northwest Herald.  And these are people who supposedly know something about journalism and the writing process.

Thanks Mr. Krug for showing us that you can Google Johnny Cash lyrics.

I can, too. In fact, maybe you should have used the lyrics for Cash’s song, “First Grade Old Maid Teacher.” I’m sure you could have worked that into your column in a “clever” way, too:

First grade old maid teacher

Getting' ready to go home

Thirty happy children

Once again are on their own

They climb aboard the school bus

She smiles and waves goodbye

But the first grade old maid teacher

Wants to cry

The fact is that The Northwest Herald has come down quite aggressively on just one side of this issue. Many of us were pleasantly surprised by Katie Anderson’s article of last week. That just doesn’t happen often in The Northwest Herald.

Perhaps Mr. Krug was on vacation that week.

No one here is saying that the teacher’s shouldn’t make concessions. I believe the teachers have to make some major concessions.

But the board has to meet them at the table and give some things up as well.

But that is not what they appear to be doing.  And that is something that The Northwest Herald should also be reporting.

But Chris Krug doesn’t want that side of the story to be told, apparently.

He would rather talk about Johnny Cash and teachers wearing black.

Pay freezes and superintendents....

I have nothing personal against Brian Coleman, the Cary District 26 superintendent.  I know that may be hard to believe as I publicly called for him to be fired at the Community Engagement Committee meeting last week.  I was a little emotional, I admit.  In fact, I almost came to tears talking about my 2nd grade son who doesn't like school.  The fact that there is no longer art, music or gym in the grade schools doesn't help his situation.  When it comes to my kids, I get a little more emotional than someone perhaps watching this debacle from the sideline.

At the last board meeting, a Cary resident stood up to publicly defend Brian Coleman, saying that he was disgusted by the anger directed at the superintendent.  No doubt, he was referring to me, among others, who have taken public swipes at the superintendent.  He talked about how Brian Coleman was an outstanding teacher for his daughter.  That may be true; I personally have no knowledge of Brian Coleman outside of his superintendency.  He may have been a fabulous teacher.  I don't know.

This is really not about Brian Coleman, however.  It is about the Board of Education and what they say and do.  This is about the inconsistencies in actions.

But let's be clear:  in this time of financial trouble, the Board of Education has been very generous to Brian Coleman.

This year, Brian Coleman's contract was renewed with the school board.  He will continue to be our superintendent until June, 2016.

According to reports, Brian Coleman "voluntarily" took a pay freeze for 2011-12.  Therefore, his base salary continues to be a little over $147,000.  With the other benefits he receives, his salary is boosted to $181,000 or so.

But is this really a pay freeze?

For the next four years of his tenure in District 26 beyond this school year, Brian Coleman's salary will be tied to the consumer price index.  This means that he could receive a boost next year.  Who knows?  The CPI for 2010 was 1.6%.  Which means that Brian Coleman would have received a 1.6% raise.  If the CPI for 2011 is 3.6%, that means the superintendent gets a 3.6% raise (If the CPI declines, does his salary decline, too?  We don't know, as the contract specifics were not made public).

Plus, according to his contract, he can get 4% extra each year if he completes some performance-based goals.

That means that Brian Coleman in actuality is eligible for close to $6000 in raises each year outside of CPI "adjustments." Even though he "voluntarily" contributes 10% to his board-paid health insurance, the superintendent can actually get pay raises each year.

Ooops.  Not actually a "freeze" is it?

The kicker is this: the teachers have offered a pay freeze as well.  In fact, they have offered a "hard freeze," meaning there is no increase based on CPI.  There is no step increase either.  (This was the situation with the offer made on August 9.  This may have changed, as the CEA has since offered another proposal.  But the details are not yet public.)

When the teachers offered that pay freeze, the board responded that a pay "freeze" is not a "cut."  They need cuts, they keep telling the teachers and the public.  Brian Coleman himself stated at a Finance Committee meeting in February, "We have to live within our budget." 

So why was a pseudo-freeze acceptable for Brian Coleman's contract?  After all, a "freeze is not a cut" they keep saying.  And as we have seen, Brian Coleman really isn't experiencing a pay freeze, after all.

There is no consistency on the part of the Board of Education.  The words and explanations that are offered by the board are not backed up by facts.

Nor are they backed up by actions.

And that is the problem.

Open Letter to the Cary Community: Support Our Teachers

Dear friends and neighbors,

I speak to you today not as “Drew Madigan,” but as a concerned parent.  Even though I am a teacher in another district, my only skin in this game are my two boys who will be in the Cary schools for the most important developmental period of their lives.

Since beginning these rants and getting involved in this issue, I knew that I was putting myself out there.  I wasn’t sure it was even something I wanted to do at first.  However, the stakes were too high, in my opinion, to remain silent.  And so I began speaking up in a very public way.  Just in a matter of a week, this website has received over 2,200 hits.   I was no longer silent, watching from the sidelines.  If I were to take shots at public figures, I knew I should expect shots in return.  That is the nature of politics.  I have experienced this before several years ago when I publicly criticized a board member in District 214 who was bent on banning books.

Let me be clear:  I have nothing against members of the board personally.  Each of them have family and children as well. They, too, want what’s best for their families.   I question their decisions, however.  I question their ability to effectively run a school district.  I question that they have my children's best interest at heart.  I fear what may happen to this community as a result of their decisions.

Some people are angry, there is no doubt about that.  All you have to do is read the online comment sections of the newspaper.  The few who are the most vitriolic truly do not understand what is at stake.  This misguided anger is projected most fervently on those who teach our children, as if all of the problems this community faces are because of them and them alone.  The assumption is made that teachers have it easy.  That they are “greedy.” Several people have commented that teachers live a “lavish” lifestyle.  Really?  Come over to my $219,000 house if you believe that.  And that was before the housing market crashed.

The Cary teachers are just like you.  They live in the same kinds of houses that you live in.  The same neighborhoods.  The same community.  In fact, these are the people to whom we entrust our children every day.  Because they are teachers, we expect something more of them---perhaps more than we expect of our neighbors.  That is because they have taken on a very important job:  to teach our kids. But not just our kids, but our neighbors’ kids, too.   We praise our children when they do well, but sometimes forget all that went into making that child live up to his or her potential.

It is a job I love.  I know I am lucky each year when school starts to have those kids in my class.  And I consider it a challenge every year to try and reach them, to get them to better themselves and push themselves to the fullest extent of their ability.  Sometimes I’m successful.  Sometimes not.  But each year is a challenge to which I look forward. 

Most teachers will tell you the same thing: it’s not just a job.  It’s a passion.  It’s a calling.

But, in times like this, people so quickly dismiss that calling.  “Anyone can do that job,” they say.  Really?  These are the people who teach our children to count.  To read and write so that teachers like me, in later grades, can carry them elsewhere.  But it is these teachers who start that work.  They build the foundation.

We live in a middle class community.  With all of the comments that I have received over the last week, it really seems to me that some people are upset that teachers are members of the middle class.   If we want teachers to live in the same community then we must be willing to accept what it takes for that.  There are hard decisions that must be made, that is for sure.  The teachers must be willing to give some things up. 

And they have. 

At what point do we turn our backs on them and give into the desire to cast blame? Remember, what happens in the schools happens to all of us as a community.  Like it or not, our schools very much affect the value of our property.  Real estate agents will tell you that one of the biggest attractors to a community are the schools.  In markets like this we cannot let our schools fail.  We must ask ourselves:  do we really want a community that our teachers cannot afford to live in?

Because that is what is happening before our eyes.  By implementing their “last, best offer,” the board is forcing unprecedented terms upon our teachers.  Our neighbors.

If this is the type of community you want, by all means support the board.  But please don’t complain when the Cary school district becomes one of the obstacles to selling a house. 

In the next week, much is going to happen. I hope everything works out and my kids have an awesome year in school.  I hope that both sides are able to sit down at the negotiating table and work things out.  

But in order to do that, the board must be willing to give as well. 

In the end, the people who help our children learn to read, who push our children to take risks and strive to do their best in a classroom are not just any teachers.

They are our teachers.

And they deserve our support.

Sincerely,

Bruce David Janu

The Rant: Will the Board Accept the New Offer to Sit Down?

As most of you have heard by now, the Cary Educational Association has submitted another offer to the Board of Education.  As was abundantly clear on Monday, the teachers are still willing to sit down at the table.  The problem:  Is the Board of Education willing?  I am not too sure.  That is why we need to keep up the pressure.

Here is another edition of The Rant.  In this episode:  viewer mail, pseudonyms and the Community Engagement Committee meeting.



Let the board know that you want them to sit back down and work it out with the teachers. Before it is too late.

Is District 26 serious about cutting (or does this philosophy only apply to teachers)?

Cary District 26 claims they do not have money.  They wanted the teachers to come up with $2 million in cuts.  And the teachers did that on August 9.  But still no deal.  The board refused to continue the negotiations and, instead, implemented their "last, best offer."

From the public opinion survey, it is clear that people think administration should endure cuts as well.  Since closing two schools, what has happened to the administrative center and those jobs there?  Let's look at the way things were in the Spring of 2009.  This was back when District 26 had six schools.  How many people were working in the Administrative office in 2009?  Twenty*  (Click on the link to see an archived page from 2009)

How many now? Nineteen

What's the difference?   Currently, Brian Coleman has one less administrative assistant. The Curriculum Coordinator position was removed as was the position of Accountant.  The Administrative Assistant to Curriculum and Special Education was moved to become Executive Administrative Assistant to the Director of Special Services.  However, three positions were added in this time:  Finance Coordinator, Payroll Clerk and receptionist in the Finance and Operations Office.

In addition, the board was able to hire 2 assistant principals for the Junior High, plus allocate $15,000 to buy 546 4-year-old used computers from another district.  Good deal on the computers, perhaps.  But should the district really be spending like this when they are in a "dire" financial situation?

Chris Jenner and Julie Jette voted against the hiring of the two administrators.  Jette thought it was more important to work on getting class sizes down.

Jenner voiced support for cutting administration.  "In the last six years our student population has gone down by 20 percent, at what point do you change the structure of the administration," he said after the vote.

Now, I may have said many things about Jenner on this site, but on this point, he was right.  The administration needs to be restructured so that less money is spent there.

It just doesn't seem like that is happening in a substantive way.

Especially since the teachers are still willing to negotiate.


* In 2009, the speech pathologist was listed on the Administration and staff support page.  She is still employed by the district and was never considered an administrator.

Fuzzy Math and Death Star Plans---My Thoughts on Tonight's Board Meeting

Chris Spoerl, D26 Board President:
Not a fan of "youtubes"

Just got back from tonight's Community Engagement Committee meeting.  Standing room only, folks.  That was great to see.  However, it was painfully clear that Board President Chris Spoerl was not happy with the videos posted on this site.  He said so.   However, I think he called them "youtubes," actually.

For a large portion of the meeting, we were all entranced by Mr. Spoerl's powerpoint regarding the current state of negotiations.  Fortunately, he never had the opportunity to finish it because there were people smarter in the room than him.  They helped point out all of the mistakes contained on those slides. 

Apparently, the board's position in regard to the current state of financial affairs is based on projections that are not rooted in reality.  And, they were not up-to-date with the last offer made by the teachers either.  But really, can we expect any better with a financial director accused of making a $1.5 million error on the audit for Huntley School District 158?  The biggest problem with schools today is not the teachers, as this board would have you believe, but the mediocre administrators who get "re-gifted" from district to district after less-than-stellar performances.

Truthfully, I am not actually sure what was on those slides.  I was standing in the back, near the door---but I think they might have been plans to Death Star.  You know, the plans Princess Leia hid in R2D2.  They could have been, for all anyone knew.  And for a moment there, board member Floyd Myers looked a little like Obi Wan Kenobi. It was a surreal.  As the board was clearly growing agitated by the crowd's attempt to correct them with facts,  I was expecting light sabers to emerge at any minute.  Or, I was hoping.  That would have been really cool.  Especially since Yoda was there.

I don't know who he was, but he was a man of wisdom.  He stood on the side of the room and clearly had experience in negotiations and the arbitration process.  He gave an unbiased assessment of the situation in District 26.  Basically, he said, the facts weren't straight.  And there was no trust.  Bingo!

But Spoerl was not going to let Yoda destroy his presentation, that was for sure.  Like the trooper he was, Spoerl always went back to the slides.  Not answering the questions or points made about the info on the slides, mind you.  It always seemed that as he tried to bring attention back to his slides, he was just hoping that people would forget that he was in the room.

As I gather my thoughts for the next "Rant," I thought this video best summarizes Chris Spoerl's attempt at a Powerpoint Presentation:



All I can say to the Board of Education is this:  Less powerpoints and more action.  Show the community that you are willing to negotiate.

That was something the teachers proved tonight.

Now, it's your turn. 

Again, I was really glad to see the turnout. We need more on Monday for the regular Board Meeting.  Don't give up on our teachers.  That is what the Board is hoping you will do.

Peace, love and happiness,

Drew Madigan

Drew Madigan Apologizes to District 26 Board of Ed

I have to say, I feel a little bad about what has been happening lately.  Due to some of my remarks in the last Cary News Update I feel the need to set the record straight by apologizing to the District 26 School Board.  That's right, you heard me correctly:  I, Drew Madigan, am going to apologize for fueling assumptions about some of the people on the board.  Apparently, there were some hard feelings (or hurt egos.  Don't know which).  I just want the board to restart the negotiation process.  Is that too much to ask for?

You can view that apology below.  Click here to read the press release.



Don't forget to attend the Community Engagement Committee meeting tonight at 6 pm at Cary Junior High and the Board of Education Meeting next Tuesday at 7 pm.

Drew Madigan to issue formal apology to District 26 Board of Ed

That's right, folks.  Drew Madigan is going to issue a public apology to the Board of Education of Cary School District 26.

Watch this space for further developments.

Come back soon.

Cary News Update: August 13, 2011

This is the first Cary News Update. More to come.

For a press release announcing this website, click here.